- Rank
- #18 of 140
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
Model evidence profile
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · Proprietary · Reasoning
currentsupported
- Overall public score
- 76.60
- Source rank
- #9
- Evidence coverage
- 7 benchmarks · 2 sources
Strongest published evidencePublic overall score 76.6 at source rank #9.
Validate before choosingValidate the selected route price, context limits, and evidence freshness before choosing.
Revision benchmark_3b14dc55ef5307cfe91356d3ea348101 · Published Aug 30, 2026 · Checked Aug 30, 2026 · stale
Relative field position
Capability radar
Percentiles use eligible source ranks. Missing axes remain unavailable and never become zero.
- Agentic percentile
- 87.8 percentileRank #18 of 140
- Coding percentile
- 95.1 percentileRank #8 of 145
- Knowledge percentile
- 96.3 percentileRank #3 of 55
- Math percentile
- 83.3 percentileRank #2 of 7
- Multimodal grounded percentile
- 91.2 percentileRank #4 of 35
- Overall percentile
- Overall: Unavailable
- Reasoning percentile
- Reasoning: Unavailable
Published measurements
Category scores
Scores retain their source units; percentile and rank appear only for eligible fields.
- Rank
- #8 of 145
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
- Rank
- #3 of 55
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
- Rank
- #2 of 7
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
- Rank
- #4 of 35
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
- Rank
- #9
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
- Rank
- Not ranked
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 7
Route-specific facts
Pricing and specifications
Conflicting routes remain separate and attributable.
anthropicbenchlm:claude-opus-4-8
primary- Input / 1M
- $5.00
- Cached input / 1M
- Unavailable
- Output / 1M
- $25.00
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Context window
- 1,000,000
- Maximum output
- Unavailable
- Input modalities
- Unavailable
- Output modalities
- Unavailable
- Release date
- 2026-05-28
- Self hosting
- Not verified
Auditable evidence
Benchmark ledger
Display values, source ranks, and provenance remain visible without implying unsupported aggregate weight.
agentic
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61.78 | #18 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
coding
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.98 | #8 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
knowledge
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.80 | #3 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
math
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.80 | #2 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
multimodalGrounded
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.40 | #4 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
reasoning
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68.30 | Not ranked | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
overall
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.60 | #9 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
Related evidence
Compare this model
claude fable vs claude opus 4 8claude mythos 5 vs claude opus 4 8claude opus 4 7 adaptive vs claude opus 4 8claude opus 4 8 vs claude opus 5claude opus 4 8 vs claude sonnet 5claude opus 4 8 vs gemini 3 1 proclaude opus 4 8 vs gemini 3 7 flashclaude opus 4 8 vs glm 5 2claude opus 4 8 vs gpt 5 5claude opus 4 8 vs gpt 5 6 lunaclaude opus 4 8 vs gpt 5 6 solclaude opus 4 8 vs gpt 5 6 terraclaude opus 4 8 vs kimi k3claude opus 4 8 vs muse spark 1 1claude opus 4 8 vs muse spark 1 2claude opus 4 8 vs qwen3 7 maxclaude opus 4 8 vs qwen3 7 plusclaude opus 4 8 vs qwen3 8 max