Claude Opus 4.8 vs
Qwen3.7 Plus

Read the published evidence, route context, and missing facts before making a local decision. This page does not name a universal winner.

Models in this comparison

Provider identity and evidence state stay balanced across the pair.

A
Model type
Proprietary
Evidence state
Supported evidence
Published context
1,000,000
VS
A
Model type
Proprietary
Evidence state
Supported evidence
Published context
1,000,000

Key implications

Broad shared-metric coverage. Each finding is tied to a published metric, price, context, or modality fact.

  1. Across compatible supported BenchLM categories, Claude Opus 4.8 has higher scores in Knowledge, Agentic, and MultimodalGrounded (and 2 more categories).

Shared metric view

The radar is a per-axis relative view; exact values and units remain available in its adjacent table.

Per-axis relative view: each axis scales to the higher published value for that exact shared metric. The table preserves the exact published values and units.
  • Claude Opus 4.8: solid line
  • Qwen3.7 Plus: dashed line
Claude Opus 4.8 and Qwen3.7 Plus shared metric radarAgenticCodingKnowledgeMultimodalGroundedOverall
Exact published values used in the per-axis relative radar chart.
MetricClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3.7 PlusUnit
Agentic61.7839.99score
Coding71.9858.4score
Knowledge86.861.3score
MultimodalGrounded85.465.7score
Overall76.665.93score

Source metrics

Friendly metric names and published units stay visible. Missing measurements remain unavailable rather than becoming a score.

Source metric comparison
MetricUnitClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3.7 Plus
Agenticscore61.7839.99
Codingscore71.9858.4
InstructionFollowingscoreUnavailable91.4
Knowledgescore86.861.3
Mathscore66.878.4
MultilingualscoreUnavailable78.9
MultimodalGroundedscore85.465.7
Reasoningscore68.379.7
Overallscore76.665.93

Agentic

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
61.78
Qwen3.7 Plus
39.99

Coding

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
71.98
Qwen3.7 Plus
58.4

InstructionFollowing

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
Unavailable
Qwen3.7 Plus
91.4

Knowledge

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
86.8
Qwen3.7 Plus
61.3

Math

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
66.8
Qwen3.7 Plus
78.4

Multilingual

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
Unavailable
Qwen3.7 Plus
78.9

MultimodalGrounded

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
85.4
Qwen3.7 Plus
65.7

Reasoning

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
68.3
Qwen3.7 Plus
79.7

Overall

Unit
score
Claude Opus 4.8
76.6
Qwen3.7 Plus
65.93

Pricing and context

Verification is shown beside each selected route. Missing facts remain Not verified.

Route pricing and context comparison
FieldUnitClaude Opus 4.8Qwen3.7 Plus
Input API priceUSD / 1M tokens$5Not verified
Output API priceUSD / 1M tokens$25Not verified
Route contexttokens1,000,000Not verified
Input modalitiespublished listNot verifiedNot verified
Output modalitiespublished listNot verifiedNot verified

Input API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
$5
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not verified

Output API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
$25
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not verified

Route context

Unit
tokens
Claude Opus 4.8
1,000,000
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not verified

Input modalities

Unit
published list
Claude Opus 4.8
Not verified
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not verified

Output modalities

Unit
published list
Claude Opus 4.8
Not verified
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not verified

Evidence provenance

Source records, route identity, timestamps, and methodology are consolidated here without declaring either model a winner.

Publication time
Aug 30, 2026, 2:15 AM UTC
Freshness
Stale — Published weekly benchmark evidence has not refreshed within 8 days.
Methodology
benchlm: benchlm_raw_composite
Model records
  • Claude Opus 4.8 — source benchlm · artifact models · model claude-opus-4-8
  • Qwen3.7 Plus — source benchlm · artifact models · model qwen3-7-plus
Selected price routes
  • Claude Opus 4.8 — route benchlm:claude-opus-4-8 · source benchlm · provider anthropic
  • Qwen3.7 Plus — Not published

Other reviewed matchups from the same published revision, ready to open without changing this result’s evidence.

Switch model pair

Choose from this result’s current and reviewed related models. Switching opens a reviewed comparison; it does not change this result’s evidence.

Step 1

Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.

Step 2

Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.