- Rank
- #3 of 140
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 5
Model evidence profile
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic · Proprietary · Reasoning
currentsupported
- Overall public score
- 83.15
- Source rank
- #2
- Evidence coverage
- 5 benchmarks · 2 sources
Strongest published evidencePublic overall score 83.15 at source rank #2.
Validate before choosingValidate the selected route price, context limits, and evidence freshness before choosing.
Revision benchmark_3b14dc55ef5307cfe91356d3ea348101 · Published Aug 30, 2026 · Checked Aug 30, 2026 · stale
Relative field position
Capability radar
Percentiles use eligible source ranks. Missing axes remain unavailable and never become zero.
- Agentic percentile
- 98.6 percentileRank #3 of 140
- Coding percentile
- 99.3 percentileRank #2 of 145
- Knowledge percentile
- 50.0 percentileRank #28 of 55
- Multimodal grounded percentile
- Multimodal grounded: Unavailable
- Overall percentile
- Overall: Unavailable
- Reasoning percentile
- Reasoning: Unavailable
Published measurements
Category scores
Scores retain their source units; percentile and rank appear only for eligible fields.
- Rank
- #2 of 145
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 5
- Rank
- #28 of 55
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 5
- Rank
- Not ranked
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 5
- Rank
- #2
- Percentile
- Benchmarks
- 5
Route-specific facts
Pricing and specifications
Conflicting routes remain separate and attributable.
anthropicbenchlm:claude-fable-5
primary- Input / 1M
- $10.00
- Cached input / 1M
- $1.00
- Output / 1M
- $50.00
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Context window
- 1,000,000
- Maximum output
- Unavailable
- Input modalities
- Unavailable
- Output modalities
- Unavailable
- Release date
- 2026-06-09
- Self hosting
- Not verified
Auditable evidence
Benchmark ledger
Display values, source ranks, and provenance remain visible without implying unsupported aggregate weight.
agentic
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.54 | #3 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
coding
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.41 | #2 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
knowledge
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.40 | #28 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
multimodalGrounded
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.80 | Not ranked | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
overall
| Score | Rank | Weight | Last Updated | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.15 | #2 | Not published | Aug 29, 2026 | BenchLM |
Related evidence
Compare this model
claude fable vs claude mythos 5claude fable vs claude opus 4 8claude fable vs claude opus 5claude fable vs claude sonnet 5claude fable vs dots3 note previewclaude fable vs gemini 3 1 proclaude fable vs gemini 3 7 flashclaude fable vs glm 5 2claude fable vs gpt 5 5claude fable vs gpt 5 6 lunaclaude fable vs gpt 5 6 solclaude fable vs gpt 5 6 terraclaude fable vs kimi k3claude fable vs muse spark 1 1claude fable vs muse spark 1 2claude fable vs qwen3 7 maxclaude fable vs qwen3 7 plusclaude fable vs qwen3 8 max