Claude Fable 5 vs
dots3-note Preview

Read the published evidence, route context, and missing facts before making a local decision. This page does not name a universal winner.

Models in this comparison

Provider identity and evidence state stay balanced across the pair.

A
Model type
Proprietary
Evidence state
Supported evidence
Published context
1,000,000
VS
D
Model type
Open Weight
Evidence state
Estimated evidence
Published context
512,000

Key implications

Insufficient shared-metric coverage. Each finding is tied to a published metric, price, context, or modality fact.

  1. Context window: Claude Fable 5 has the larger published context window (1,000,000 tokens vs 512,000 tokens).

Shared metric view

A radar is shown only when at least four compatible supported score metrics are published.

Comparable metric detail

  • AgenticClaude Fable 5: 75.54 · dots3-note Preview: 61.1
  • CodingClaude Fable 5: 81.41 · dots3-note Preview: 61.5
  • InstructionFollowingClaude Fable 5: Unavailable · dots3-note Preview: 92.2
  • KnowledgeClaude Fable 5: 67.4 · dots3-note Preview: 76.2
  • MultimodalGroundedClaude Fable 5: 60.8 · dots3-note Preview: 63.6
  • ReasoningClaude Fable 5: Unavailable · dots3-note Preview: 76
  • OverallClaude Fable 5: 83.15 · dots3-note Preview: 68.66

Source metrics

Friendly metric names and published units stay visible. Missing measurements remain unavailable rather than becoming a score.

Source metric comparison
MetricUnitClaude Fable 5dots3-note Preview
Agenticscore75.5461.1
Codingscore81.4161.5
InstructionFollowingscoreUnavailable92.2
Knowledgescore67.476.2
MultimodalGroundedscore60.863.6
ReasoningscoreUnavailable76
Overallscore83.1568.66

Agentic

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
75.54
dots3-note Preview
61.1

Coding

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
81.41
dots3-note Preview
61.5

InstructionFollowing

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
Unavailable
dots3-note Preview
92.2

Knowledge

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
67.4
dots3-note Preview
76.2

MultimodalGrounded

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
60.8
dots3-note Preview
63.6

Reasoning

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
Unavailable
dots3-note Preview
76

Overall

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
83.15
dots3-note Preview
68.66

Pricing and context

Verification is shown beside each selected route. Missing facts remain Not verified.

Route pricing and context comparison
FieldUnitClaude Fable 5dots3-note Preview
Input API priceUSD / 1M tokens$10Not verified
Cached input API priceUSD / 1M tokens$1Not verified
Output API priceUSD / 1M tokens$50Not verified
Route contexttokens1,000,000Not verified
Input modalitiespublished listNot verifiedNot verified
Output modalitiespublished listNot verifiedNot verified

Input API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
$10
dots3-note Preview
Not verified

Cached input API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
$1
dots3-note Preview
Not verified

Output API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
$50
dots3-note Preview
Not verified

Route context

Unit
tokens
Claude Fable 5
1,000,000
dots3-note Preview
Not verified

Input modalities

Unit
published list
Claude Fable 5
Not verified
dots3-note Preview
Not verified

Output modalities

Unit
published list
Claude Fable 5
Not verified
dots3-note Preview
Not verified

Evidence provenance

Source records, route identity, timestamps, and methodology are consolidated here without declaring either model a winner.

Publication time
Aug 30, 2026, 2:15 AM UTC
Freshness
Stale — Published weekly benchmark evidence has not refreshed within 8 days.
Methodology
benchlm: benchlm_raw_composite
Model records
  • Claude Fable 5 — source benchlm · artifact models · model claude-fable-5
  • dots3-note Preview — source benchlm · artifact models · model dots3-note-preview
Selected price routes
  • Claude Fable 5 — route benchlm:claude-fable-5 · source benchlm · provider anthropic
  • dots3-note Preview — Not published

Other reviewed matchups from the same published revision, ready to open without changing this result’s evidence.

Switch model pair

Choose from this result’s current and reviewed related models. Switching opens a reviewed comparison; it does not change this result’s evidence.

Step 1

Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.

Step 2

Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.