Claude Fable 5 vs
GPT-5.6 Sol

Read the published evidence, route context, and missing facts before making a local decision. This page does not name a universal winner.

Models in this comparison

Provider identity and evidence state stay balanced across the pair.

A
Model type
Proprietary
Evidence state
Supported evidence
Published context
1,000,000
VS
Model type
Proprietary
Evidence state
Supported evidence
Published context
1,050,000

Key implications

Broad shared-metric coverage. Each finding is tied to a published metric, price, context, or modality fact.

  1. Across compatible supported BenchLM categories, Claude Fable 5 has higher scores in Agentic, Coding, and Overall; GPT-5.6 Sol has a higher score in Knowledge.
  2. Input API price: GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower verified rate ($5 / 1M tokens vs $10 / 1M tokens).
  3. Output API price: GPT-5.6 Sol has the lower verified rate ($30 / 1M tokens vs $50 / 1M tokens).
  4. Context window: GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger published context window (1,050,000 tokens vs 1,000,000 tokens).

Shared metric view

The radar is a per-axis relative view; exact values and units remain available in its adjacent table.

Per-axis relative view: each axis scales to the higher published value for that exact shared metric. The table preserves the exact published values and units.
  • Claude Fable 5: solid line
  • GPT-5.6 Sol: dashed line
Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol shared metric radarAgenticCodingKnowledgeOverall
Exact published values used in the per-axis relative radar chart.
MetricClaude Fable 5GPT-5.6 SolUnit
Agentic75.5468.88score
Coding81.4179.01score
Knowledge67.486score
Overall83.1582.2score

Source metrics

Friendly metric names and published units stay visible. Missing measurements remain unavailable rather than becoming a score.

Source metric comparison
MetricUnitClaude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Sol
Agenticscore75.5468.88
Codingscore81.4179.01
Knowledgescore67.486
MathscoreUnavailable97
MultimodalGroundedscore60.882.7
ReasoningscoreUnavailable85.2
Overallscore83.1582.2

Agentic

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
75.54
GPT-5.6 Sol
68.88

Coding

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
81.41
GPT-5.6 Sol
79.01

Knowledge

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
67.4
GPT-5.6 Sol
86

Math

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
Unavailable
GPT-5.6 Sol
97

MultimodalGrounded

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
60.8
GPT-5.6 Sol
82.7

Reasoning

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
Unavailable
GPT-5.6 Sol
85.2

Overall

Unit
score
Claude Fable 5
83.15
GPT-5.6 Sol
82.2

Pricing and context

Verification is shown beside each selected route. Missing facts remain Not verified.

Route pricing and context comparison
FieldUnitClaude Fable 5GPT-5.6 Sol
Input API priceUSD / 1M tokens$10$5
Cached input API priceUSD / 1M tokens$1$0.5
Output API priceUSD / 1M tokens$50$30
Route contexttokens1,000,0001,050,000
Input modalitiespublished listNot verifiedNot verified
Output modalitiespublished listNot verifiedNot verified

Input API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
$10
GPT-5.6 Sol
$5

Cached input API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
$1
GPT-5.6 Sol
$0.5

Output API price

Unit
USD / 1M tokens
Claude Fable 5
$50
GPT-5.6 Sol
$30

Route context

Unit
tokens
Claude Fable 5
1,000,000
GPT-5.6 Sol
1,050,000

Input modalities

Unit
published list
Claude Fable 5
Not verified
GPT-5.6 Sol
Not verified

Output modalities

Unit
published list
Claude Fable 5
Not verified
GPT-5.6 Sol
Not verified

Evidence provenance

Source records, route identity, timestamps, and methodology are consolidated here without declaring either model a winner.

Publication time
Aug 30, 2026, 2:15 AM UTC
Freshness
Stale — Published weekly benchmark evidence has not refreshed within 8 days.
Methodology
benchlm: benchlm_raw_composite
Model records
  • Claude Fable 5 — source benchlm · artifact models · model claude-fable-5
  • GPT-5.6 Sol — source benchlm · artifact models · model gpt-5-6-sol
Selected price routes
  • Claude Fable 5 — route benchlm:claude-fable-5 · source benchlm · provider anthropic
  • GPT-5.6 Sol — route benchlm:gpt-5-6-sol · source benchlm · provider openai

Other reviewed matchups from the same published revision, ready to open without changing this result’s evidence.

Switch model pair

Choose from this result’s current and reviewed related models. Switching opens a reviewed comparison; it does not change this result’s evidence.

Step 1

Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.

Step 2

Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.