Z
Z.AI
GLM-5.1
- Model type
- Open Weight
- Evidence state
- Supported evidence
- Published context
- 203,000
GLM-5.1 vs
Ling 2.6 Flash
Read the published evidence, route context, and missing facts before making a local decision. This page does not name a universal winner.
Models in this comparison
Provider identity and evidence state stay balanced across the pair.
I
InclusionAI
Ling 2.6 Flash
- Model type
- Open Weight
- Evidence state
- Estimated evidence
- Published context
- 262,000
Key implications
Insufficient shared-metric coverage. Each finding is tied to a published metric, price, context, or modality fact.
- Context window: Ling 2.6 Flash has the larger published context window (262,000 tokens vs 203,000 tokens).
Shared metric view
A radar is shown only when at least four compatible supported score metrics are published.
Comparable metric detail
- AgenticGLM-5.1: 45.33 · Ling 2.6 Flash: 41.83
- CodingGLM-5.1: 61.5 · Ling 2.6 Flash: 46.04
- InstructionFollowingGLM-5.1: Unavailable · Ling 2.6 Flash: 48.2
- KnowledgeGLM-5.1: 75.7 · Ling 2.6 Flash: 50.2
- MathGLM-5.1: 64.5 · Ling 2.6 Flash: Unavailable
- OverallGLM-5.1: 67.04 · Ling 2.6 Flash: 44.26
Source metrics
Friendly metric names and published units stay visible. Missing measurements remain unavailable rather than becoming a score.
| Metric | Unit | GLM-5.1 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | score | 45.33 | 41.83 |
| Coding | score | 61.5 | 46.04 |
| InstructionFollowing | score | Unavailable | 48.2 |
| Knowledge | score | 75.7 | 50.2 |
| Math | score | 64.5 | Unavailable |
| Overall | score | 67.04 | 44.26 |
Agentic
- Unit
- score
- GLM-5.1
- 45.33
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 41.83
Coding
- Unit
- score
- GLM-5.1
- 61.5
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 46.04
InstructionFollowing
- Unit
- score
- GLM-5.1
- Unavailable
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 48.2
Knowledge
- Unit
- score
- GLM-5.1
- 75.7
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 50.2
Math
- Unit
- score
- GLM-5.1
- 64.5
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Unavailable
Overall
- Unit
- score
- GLM-5.1
- 67.04
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 44.26
Pricing and context
Verification is shown beside each selected route. Missing facts remain Not verified.
| Field | Unit | GLM-5.1 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input API price | USD / 1M tokens | $1.4 | Not verified |
| Output API price | USD / 1M tokens | $4.4 | Not verified |
| Route context | tokens | 203,000 | Not verified |
| Input modalities | published list | Not verified | Not verified |
| Output modalities | published list | Not verified | Not verified |
Input API price
- Unit
- USD / 1M tokens
- GLM-5.1
- $1.4
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Not verified
Output API price
- Unit
- USD / 1M tokens
- GLM-5.1
- $4.4
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Not verified
Route context
- Unit
- tokens
- GLM-5.1
- 203,000
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Not verified
Input modalities
- Unit
- published list
- GLM-5.1
- Not verified
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Not verified
Output modalities
- Unit
- published list
- GLM-5.1
- Not verified
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Not verified
Evidence provenance
Source records, route identity, timestamps, and methodology are consolidated here without declaring either model a winner.
- Publication time
- Aug 30, 2026, 2:15 AM UTC
- Freshness
- Stale — Published weekly benchmark evidence has not refreshed within 8 days.
- Methodology
- benchlm: benchlm_raw_composite
- Model records
- GLM-5.1 — source benchlm · artifact models · model glm-5-1
- Ling 2.6 Flash — source benchlm · artifact models · model ling-2-6-flash
- Selected price routes
- GLM-5.1 — route benchlm:glm-5-1 · source benchlm · provider z-ai
- Ling 2.6 Flash — Not published
Switch model pair
Choose from this result’s current and reviewed related models. Switching opens a reviewed comparison; it does not change this result’s evidence.
Step 1
Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.
Step 2
Start with popular models, or search the full selectable directory.